The Baltimore Ravens have been making headlines lately, but unfortunately, not for their on-field performance. In one of the most bizarre incidents in recent NFL history, wide receiver Diontae Johnson reportedly refused to take the field during a game against the Philadelphia Eagles. As a result, the team chose to suspend him without pay for one game. This decision has sparked a lot of debate and criticism, with many questioning the Ravens’ handling of the situation. However, former NFL player Mike Golic has weighed in on the matter and believes that the team should go even further and cut Johnson from the roster.
Golic, who is known for his outspoken opinions, did not hold back when discussing the Ravens’ decision to suspend Johnson. He stated that the team should have taken even harsher action against the player, suggesting that cutting him from the roster would have been a more appropriate punishment. While some may see this as a harsh stance, Golic makes a valid point. The Ravens are a highly respected team in the NFL, and their actions should reflect that. By choosing to suspend Johnson, they are essentially giving him a slap on the wrist and allowing him to return to the team after just one game. This sends the wrong message to both the player and the rest of the team.
But why should the Ravens go as far as cutting Johnson from the team? Well, let’s take a closer look at the incident. According to reports, Johnson refused to take the field because he was unhappy with his role in the game. This is not only unprofessional but also disrespectful to his teammates and coaches. The NFL is a team sport, and players are expected to put the team’s needs above their own. By refusing to play, Johnson showed a lack of commitment and dedication to the team, which are essential qualities for any successful player.
Moreover, this is not the first time Johnson has caused trouble for the Ravens. Earlier this year, he was involved in a heated argument with a teammate during a game. While these incidents may seem minor, they are indicative of a larger issue. Johnson’s attitude and behavior are not in line with the values and standards of the Ravens organization. As a team known for its strong work ethic and discipline, it is crucial that they maintain a high level of professionalism both on and off the field. By keeping Johnson on the team, they are sending a message that this type of behavior is acceptable, which can have a negative impact on team morale and culture.
Some may argue that cutting Johnson from the team is too harsh of a punishment for his actions. However, it is important to remember that playing in the NFL is a privilege, not a right. Players are held to a high standard, and any behavior that goes against the values of the team and the league should not be tolerated. By cutting Johnson, the Ravens would be sending a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated, and they are committed to upholding their standards of professionalism.
In addition, keeping Johnson on the team could have negative consequences for the Ravens’ performance on the field. The team is currently in the midst of a playoff race, and any distractions or disruptions could have a detrimental effect on their performance. By cutting Johnson, the team can focus on their goals and continue to work towards a successful season without any added drama or controversy.
In conclusion, while the Ravens’ decision to suspend Johnson may seem like a suitable punishment, it is not enough. By cutting him from the team, the Ravens would be sending a strong message that they will not tolerate any behavior that goes against their values and standards. Moreover, it would allow the team to move forward without any distractions and continue their pursuit of a successful season. As for Johnson, this could be a wake-up call and an opportunity for him to reflect on his actions and make necessary changes for the better.
