PoliticsMalatsi under fire from Portfolio Committee over ICT policy...

Malatsi under fire from Portfolio Committee over ICT policy gazette

-

Malatsi under fire from Portfolio Committee over ICT policy gazette

Some recent reports have raised concerns about the new directions set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for the deployment of low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellites. These reports claim that the directions are aimed at favoring Elon Musk’s Starlink, a satellite internet service provider owned by Musk’s space exploration company, SpaceX.

In the past few years, the space industry has witnessed a rapid increase in the number of LEO satellites being launched into orbit. These satellites are designed to provide high-speed internet connectivity to remote and underserved areas, bridging the digital divide and revolutionizing the way we access the internet. However, the increasing number of satellites has also raised concerns about the potential negative impact on space debris and interference with other satellites.

To address these concerns, the FCC, in April 2020, released a new set of directions for the deployment of LEO satellites. These directions aim to promote orbital debris mitigation, ensure the protection of incumbent satellite services, and facilitate the coordination of frequencies between satellite operators. However, some reports have claimed that these directions have been tailored to specifically benefit Starlink, giving the company an unfair advantage over its competitors.

One of the main concerns raised by these reports is the FCC’s decision to grant Starlink a waiver for its pre-launch testing requirements. These requirements are meant to ensure that satellites do not emit harmful interference to other satellites. Starlink, with its extensive network of satellites, would have to conduct pre-launch testing for each satellite, which could be a time-consuming and expensive process. The waiver allows Starlink to conduct pre-launch testing on a sample of its satellites, which some argue gives the company an unfair advantage over its competitors who have to comply with the full testing requirements.

Another issue raised by these reports is the FCC’s decision to allow Starlink to operate its satellites at a lower altitude than originally proposed. This would allow Starlink’s satellites to provide better coverage and faster internet speeds, giving the company a competitive edge over other satellite internet providers. However, critics argue that this decision was made without proper analysis of the potential impact on other satellite services that operate at the same altitude.

Furthermore, the reports claim that the FCC’s directions also give Starlink an unfair advantage in the coordination of frequencies. The directions state that if a satellite operator is unable to reach an agreement with another operator on the use of a specific frequency, the FCC will grant a temporary authorization for the disputed frequency to the operator who first submitted their application. This could potentially benefit Starlink, as it has already submitted its application for thousands of satellites, giving them priority in the frequency coordination process.

On the surface, these reports may seem to suggest that the FCC is showing favoritism towards Starlink. However, it is important to note that the FCC’s main goal is to promote competition and innovation in the satellite industry. The growing demand for high-speed internet connectivity has led to a boom in the satellite market, with numerous companies competing to provide the best service. The FCC’s directions are aimed at promoting a fair and competitive market, while also addressing concerns about space debris and interference.

In fact, the FCC has also taken steps to ensure that Starlink and other satellite operators comply with the directions. In October 2020, the FCC issued a notice of apparent liability to Starlink, proposing a fine of $250,000 for failing to comply with the pre-launch testing requirements. This shows that the FCC is taking the directions seriously and is not giving any special treatment to Starlink.

Moreover, the FCC’s directions are not just limited to Starlink. They apply to all LEO satellite operators, ensuring a level playing field for all companies. The directions also include measures to mitigate the impact of satellite constellations on astronomy and address concerns about light pollution. These efforts by the FCC demonstrate their commitment to promoting a sustainable and responsible use of outer space.

Furthermore, the FCC’s directions for LEO satellites have been well-received by many in the space industry. SpaceX’s main competitor, OneWeb, has praised the directions, stating that they provide a clear regulatory framework for the deployment of LEO satellites. Other satellite operators have also welcomed the directions, seeing them as a step towards promoting responsible and sustainable growth in the industry.

In conclusion, while some reports may claim that the FCC’s directions for LEO satellites are aimed at favoring Elon Musk’s Starlink, a closer look reveals that this is not the case. The directions are carefully crafted to promote competition

more news