As the United States President Donald Trump continues to move from one bombing campaign to another, it seems that the liberal media is working hard to paint a positive image of the controversial leader. This practice, often referred to as “liberal-washing,” is a concerning trend that only serves to distract from the destructive actions of the current administration.

It is no secret that President Trump has a penchant for military action, often using it as a means to flex his power and assert dominance on the global stage. In just the first two years of his presidency, Trump has authorized airstrikes in Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan, and other countries, causing immense harm and destruction to innocent civilians. And yet, instead of holding him accountable for these actions, the liberal media seems to be giving him a pass.

The term “liberal-washing” refers to the practice of using liberal or progressive rhetoric to justify or downplay the actions of a conservative leader. In the case of President Trump, this means glossing over his aggressive foreign policies and instead focusing on his occasional use of progressive language or actions. This manipulation of language and narrative not only serves to mislead the public but also gives the impression that the current administration is not as harmful as it truly is.

One example of this liberal-washing can be seen in the coverage of Trump’s recent decision to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal. While many liberals and progressives have criticized this move, the media has focused more on the potential implications for the economy and less on the potential human cost of this decision. This is a clear case of liberal-washing, as it downplays the impact of Trump’s actions on innocent lives in the Middle East.

Another way in which the media is liberal-washing Trump is by constantly comparing him to previous conservative presidents. For instance, the media often refers to Trump’s decision to move the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem as a continuation of longstanding US policy. While this may be true, it fails to acknowledge the controversial nature of this move and the potential consequences for regional stability. By comparing Trump to previous presidents, the media is again downplaying the severity of his actions and failing to hold him accountable for his destructive foreign policies.

It is important to note that this liberal-washing of Trump is not just a problem with the media but also with some members of the Democratic Party. In an effort to appeal to centrist voters, some Democratic politicians have also adopted a more moderate tone when it comes to criticizing Trump’s foreign policies. This only serves to further perpetuate the false narrative that Trump’s actions are not as destructive as they truly are.

As concerned citizens, we must be vigilant and not fall for this liberal-washing of Trump. We must demand that the media and our political leaders hold him accountable for the harm he is causing around the world. It is not enough to simply criticize his use of language or occasional progressive actions; we must also condemn his aggressive foreign policies and demand a more peaceful approach to global issues.

Furthermore, we must also recognize that the liberal-washing of Trump is a symptom of a larger problem within our society. It is a reflection of the normalization of aggressive foreign policies and the glorification of military action. As citizens of a democratic society, it is our responsibility to push back against this narrative and demand a more peaceful and humane approach to international relations.

In conclusion, as President Trump continues his pattern of bombing one country after another, it is crucial that we do not fall for the liberal-washing being perpetuated by the media and some political leaders. We must hold our leaders accountable for their actions and demand a more progressive and peaceful approach to foreign policy. Let us not be complicit in the whitewashing of Trump’s destructive actions; instead, let us speak out and demand a better and more just world for all.